“Someone must have moved it! I put it right here, where I would remember where to find it. It must be here somewhere.” Have you noticed that the time it takes to find something is often directly proportional to the time we have spent on this earth? Our memory seems so clear, but the object of our quest never seems exactly where we clearly remember it being. We are tempted to chalk it up to frailty or confusion, but the reality is that while the item never moved, our memory of it did.
The memories we retrieve are never exactly the same as the memories we stored. They are never exactly where we put them. No doubt you have gone to a memorable restaurant only to say, “it just wasn’t how I remembered it.” It may have been as it was, yet still not how you remembered it. The hard facts of our memories are stored away with lots of personal context: the physical development or changes to our brains, our maturity, present knowledge of the world, smells, sounds, sensations. When we retrieve them years later, we are different people. And so are our memories.
The editors of Science News Today expressed it well.
Every time you remember, you are reactivating patterns of electrical and chemical activity that have been shaped, modified, and stored inside an unimaginably complex network of neurons. The process is not like retrieving a file from a computer. It’s more like conducting a symphony, where different instruments (brain regions) join in at precisely the right moments, weaving together the sensory, emotional, and factual threads that make a memory come alive… But retrieval is not perfect. Each time you recall a memory, you are reconstructing it, not replaying it like a video. Details can change subtly, influenced by your current mood, beliefs, and new experiences. In this way, memory is both reliable and fragile—a living, evolving record rather than a static archive.
Both reliable and fragile! While this makes for great storytelling, consider how challenging this is for a criminal justice system that depends on eye-witness testimony to reconstruct a crime with factual absolutism, not perspectival recollection. Trial lawyers have their work cut out for them. And add to the “fragile” memory of witnesses, the mix of witness motivations and anxieties further threaten the reliability of their testimony for a system whose burden of proof is “beyond a reasonable doubt.”
A “kangaroo court,” however, has little angst over the challenges of reliable testimony. It delights in the crystal clarity of false testimony to disregard the rights of the accused and secure a predetermined conviction. Kangaroo courts depend upon liars to speak loudly and emphatically while men of conviction remain silent. A dynamic we see clearly in the kangaroo court in the palace of Caiphas before the Sanhedrin on the night Jesus was betrayed.
Wicked prosecutors preside. They, more than anyone, have seen and understand the faithful testimony of Jesus’ life and witness as the “the Christ, the Son of the Blessed.” Yet he is not the type of Christ they want. They want political deliverance. Not deliverance from sin. The only god they love and worship is the god of self. They have no trouble gathering liars to give false testimony. Though perhaps they should have looked for better liars. And the one man who should have been willing to speak up for Jesus, cowered in denial in the courtyard below, remaining silent while evil men spoke loudly.
Jesus’ trial before the Sanhedrin, recorded in Mark 14:53-72, violated every rule of due process. A capital offense, tried in only one hearing, held at night, with an illegal change of venue, and during the feast, prosecuted by corrupt judges and packed with false witnesses while Jesus’ disciples’ testimony is either absent or silent. Only one faithful witness is present. And Jesus’ truthful testimony is the only thing this crooked court can use to convict him.
History knows no greater travesty of justice than the trials of Jesus. And yet through the injustice of men, divine justice is fully satisfied. As Paul writes, in Jesus Christ, God shows that he is both “just and the justifier of the one who has faith in Jesus.” The trial of Jesus is filled with everything but the truth, with unbelieving witnesses, untruthful witnesses, and an unwilling witness.
What about you? You have heard about Jesus, who he is and what he has done. Is he not the type of Jesus you want? Would you rather believe a lie about yourself than the truth about him? Or are you simply unwilling to risk following him? The trial of Jesus confronts us with the question Pilate would later ask, “What shall I do with your King?” What is your response to Jesus? What will you do with this King?
Join us as we examine Mark 14:53-72 and consider our response to the truth about Jesus. We meet Sundays at 10:30 am on the square in Pottsville, Arkansas right next to historic Potts’ Inn for worship. Get directions here or contact us for more info. Or join our livestream on YouTube.